When I say I'm trying to reduce the stigma around mental illness, especially Bipolar Disorder, I am also including myself in that. Sometimes I forget and/or can't believe that's what is going on with me, and it makes me feel pretty bad about myself. Especially when other people refer to mentally ill people in a negative way, or call them "crazy" (I have already mentioned I don't like that word).
Yesterday at work I watched a training video on mental illnesses, with an emphasis on how they affect people experiencing homelessness. It focused on Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, and Personality Disorders. It was from an "outsiders" perspective and was more statistical and generalizing, but I suppose that makes sense, since the audience is intended to be people who work in a social services type job. Even with that in mind, it didn't make me feel great.
Going in to the video, I didn't love that my personal affliction was being analyzed in a way that made it sound like a problem. Like a "how to deal with these kinds of crazy people" kind of way. First the presenter talked about how much of the general public and how many unhoused people are diagnosed Bipolar Disorder. Then, he went over a brief summary of symptoms (without differentiating between Bipolar I and Bipolar II), focusing on how problematic the manias can be. But what really grinds my gears, is the presented BRIEFLY mentioned that there are in fact three (technically, depending on who you ask) kinds of Bipolar: I, II, and III aka cyclothymic disorder. He specifically said NOT to call Bipolar II a "lesser version" of Bipolar I and then goes on to say that "but if you look at the symptoms, it certainly seems like a lesser version..." RAGE! "FLAMES! FLAMES ON THE SIDE OF MY FACE!"
Comments
Post a Comment